To 2.2 or not to 2.2

Common Topics discuss everything from supported file formats used with DRS 2006 radio automation, how to import 3rd party playlists, catching satellite feeds and much, much more.

To 2.2 or not to 2.2

Postby Stashu » Fri Jan 02, 2009 7:33 pm

Is there anything against running 2.2 on XP? I read a while back some comments about 2.2 being a fix for Vista only.
Besides the Vista changes, were there any updates that make 2.2 better?
Consulting. Imaging.
Stashu
Super Broadcaster
Super Broadcaster
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: USA

Postby Stashu » Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:51 pm

Any comments? Any one?
I still want to know if there were any changes or improvements that make 2.2 better than 2.1.
I also want to know if 2.2 will run on XP SP2 or SP3.
Consulting. Imaging.
Stashu
Super Broadcaster
Super Broadcaster
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: USA

Postby Adriaan » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:04 pm

Yes, version 2.2 works fine on Windows XP SP3.
Adriaan
 

Postby Stashu » Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:59 am

Thanks. Any new things in 2.2, or is it just a Vista fix?
Consulting. Imaging.
Stashu
Super Broadcaster
Super Broadcaster
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: USA

Postby Adriaan » Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:32 am

I am not running DRS2006 V2.2 Live.
Being used to work with V3 beta's, i don't wanna go back :wink:

As far as I can see there are no big differences V2.11 <> 2.2.
Adriaan
 

Postby Stashu » Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:26 pm

I know. I'm using 3.0 also.
The Pros are: 2.2 is a complete package. 3.0 has the bells and whistles to make automation better.
The Cons are: 3.0 is not a complete package. 2.2 doesn't have the bells and whistles to make automation better. :)
Consulting. Imaging.
Stashu
Super Broadcaster
Super Broadcaster
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: USA


Return to DRS 2006 Common Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron